Marketing No Comments

Call to end mortgage tax relief on buy-to-lets

Two policy experts who have had the close ear of the prime minister are recommending the government entirely abandon mortgage interest relief for landlords.

Neil O’Brien and Will Tanner, both former advisers to Theresa May, endorse ending tax breaks for buy-to-let investors as one of 10 ways to stop people buying homes as investments.

This is despite the tax breaks being curtailed already, the duo acknowledges in their report — seen as an attempt to reinstate the Conservatives as the party of home-ownership.

But O’Brien wants to go further, saying mortgage interest deductions that can still be made should be abolished fully, for either new investors or new properties let-out after a fixed date.

While the government “should protect existing landlords” with active investments, the mortgage interest relief system should be reformed in the future, as should their other ‘perk.’

“On a grandfathered basis, end loopholes within the CGT exemption for the primary residence,” adds the report, referring to landlords’ avoiding CGT on residential property.

Mr Tanner reflected: “We should rebalance the housing market away from owning for a return and towards owning for a home.

“It is a sobering thought that if Britain had maintained the balance between privately-rented and owner-occupied properties since 2000, we would have two million more families owning their own home.”

Put another way, the growth of buy-to-let (helped by favourable tax treatment) has “locked 2.2 million families out of [home] ownership,” argues O’Brien, the Tory MP for Harborough.

He also wants the Treasury to review the tax treatment of ‘wear and tear,’ saying while the new system after 2015 is fairer, it still offers landlords an advantage over owner-occupiers.

“Ministers could also look again at the generosity of the relief,” the MP says.

“Taken together, the reforms to mortgage interest rate relief and wear and tear allowances announced in Summer Budget 2015 were scored as raising £835 million a year by 2020/21.”

The report says the evidence from the 2015 and 2016 changes for landlords is that tax reforms can have a “positive impact on homeownership,” but it notes that the “measures taken so far are not large enough to produce a step change in ownership.”

Source: Contractor

Marketing No Comments

Financial pressure on landlords is harming the PRS not improving it!

In a report published 25th June, property expert Kate Faulkner has claimed that while legislation has been introduced to improve the private rented sector (PRS), it is not being properly communicated to landlords, agents and tenants.

Writing in her seventh report funded by the TDS Charitable Foundation, Kate highlights the ever-increasing financial and administrative pressures on landlords and agents due to legislative changes.

Of over 147 new pieces of legislation, covering the sector, more than half have been introduced since buy-to-let mortgages were launched in 1996. While the percentage of homes in the PRS classed as ‘non-decent’ has reduced (47% in 2006 to 28% in 2015), there has been an increase in real terms as the sector has grown (1.2 million in 2006 to 1.3 million) over the same period.

Commenting on the report, Kate said: “Due to the rising costs to good landlords and a scant enforcement of PRS regulations, there is an incentive for some landlords and agents to act outside the law to increase their profit margins.

“The increased costs to landlords of buying a property, then letting it legally and safely, means that in some cases rents have increased beyond the means of some tenants. Reputable landlords and agents are being penalised financially for abiding by the law.

“It can create a vicious cycle and a two-tiered rental market, which the legislation was never intended to create.

“The problem, as I see it, is that bills are introduced on the sector all the time, but aren’t backed with a communications plan or funding for enforcement. As I wrote for a previous TDS Charitable Foundation report; legislation is meaningless without enforcement.

“Myriad legislation can be confusing for tenants and rogue landlords and agents often get away with offering sub-standard homes as tenants don’t know their rights. In reality, tenants hold the power in terms of accepting or rejecting poor or dangerous properties, although where supply is scant, this power disappears.

“I would like to see a more concerted approach to educating tenants on their rights. Nobody could have escaped hearing about the introduction of GDPR, but when rental laws are introduced, affecting millions of people across the country, there doesn’t appear to be the same public awareness campaign.

“That is not to say that legislation introduced has been wrong-headed or ineffectual, but it could have had a greater positive impact on the sector if it were backed with enforcement and communication.”

The TDS Charitable Foundation commissioned Kate Faulkner to produce research reports into the PRS to improve knowledge and educate landlords, agents and tenants, in line with the Foundation’s aims. Her latest report, What are the real legal requirements and costs of letting a property, and how can we communicate them better to landlords and tenants? Is now available to download as a PDF.

While the TDS Charitable Foundation funds the reports, Kate retains editorial control and the opinions expressed in the report do not necessarily reflect the views of Tenancy Deposit Scheme (TDS) or the TDS Charitable Foundation.

Source: Property118

Marketing No Comments

Can this solve the UK’s chronic housing shortage?

The growth of the buy to let market has locked over 2 million families out of homeownership, preventing younger generations the chance to become part of the property owning democracy, according to a new report by the campaigning think tank Onward.

The report authored by leading Conservative MP, Neil O’Brien, argues that the government should limit the demand for property as an investment with a crack down on landlords tax relief for future rented properties. The paper also calls for councils to be given more powers to limit overseas purchases of new homes. At the same time, the think tank calls for a radical set of policies need to be implemented to increase the supply of new homes.

 The report exposes the sheer scale of problems which have built up in Britain’s housing market, driving the decline in homeownership over the last 15 years. New analysis in the paper reveals that:

France has built roughly twice as many new homes each year as Britain since 1970. France built 7.8 million more homes than the UK between 1970 and 2015 – a difference equivalent to every home in Greater London, Scotland and Wales put together. As a result, real house price growth in France has been just half the rate the UK and the proportion of people who spend more than 40% of their income on housing is less than half the rate in Britain. Some densely populated countries like the Netherlands built at an even faster rate than France.

The cost of renting has risen dramatically and nearly half of young men are now forced to live with parents. New analysis from the House of Commons Library included in the report shows that from the 1960s to the early 1980s private renters spent on average around 10% of their income on rent in most of the country, and around 15% in London. Today they spend over 30% and nearly 40% respectively. Meanwhile between 2000 and 2017, the number of 18-30-year-olds living in their parents’ home increased by about 1.1 million. Nearly half (48%) of men aged 22-26 now live with their parents.

Developers and landowners are benefiting most from the current system. Between 1950 and 2012, 74% of the increase in Britain’s housing costs was accounted for by increases in the cost of land. The value created when planning permission is granted overwhelmingly accumulates to developers, meaning communities are missing out on up to £9 billion of land value uplift created each year. Meanwhile many large developments go ahead without anything being contributed anything to the wider community. 7% of developments of over 1,000 homes had no developer contributions charged on them in 2016/17. For developments of between 100 and 999 homes, 26% made no contributions.

The growth of buy to let has locked 2.2 million families out of ownership. If the ratio of privately rented to privately owned homes had remained the same between 2000-2015, and we had built the same number of homes, we would have ended up with 2.2 million more homes in owner-occupation.

The report argues that while building more homes is important, homeownership is unlikely to return to previous levels without action to stem further growth of the rented sector. It notes that while the number of privately-owned homes has grown by 165,000 a year over the last decade, ownership has still declined because this has been outweighed by the 195,000-a-year growth in the number of properties in the private-rented sector.

Source: London Loves Business

Marketing No Comments

Small landlords will dwindle away

The private rental sector of the future will be dominated by larger institutional landlords as the number of hobbyist landlords decreases.

This prediction is from Roma Finance, the specialist bridging finance and development lender, who reports that more and more landlords are using limited companies to maximise tax efficiencies on their investments – and this is set to continue.

Those landlords with fewer than five properties will disappear as the cost of managing their properties and keeping up with ever-changing legislation will prove to be prohibitive.

However, with the number of landlords reducing this won’t affect the number of buy-to-let properties available for rent, but extra administration costs could ultimately increase the rents charged to tenants.

Roma says that landlords are evolving in many different ways, from the legal structure of their holdings, the make-up of their portfolios, the quality requirements they will have to adhere to and the way they will finance properties going forward.

New HMO rules

An area of concern is the impact of the new Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO) regulations coming into force on 1 October. The number of storeys will be removed from the definition of HMO and minimum room sizes will be set.

Those landlords with one or two storey HMOs will be subject to mandatory licencing requirements by their local council. The Residential Landlords Association estimates that in the UK this will affect an extra 177,000 properties.

EPC ratings

The new EPC ratings which came into force on 1 April mean that rental properties need to be rated as E or above, those rated F and G can’t be let to new tenants or have tenancies extended.

Roma says this provides bridging lenders with a new opportunity to back professional landlords to acquire ‘un-rentable’ properties with a view to improving their EPC rating, which in turn will make them eligible for longer term buy-to-let mortgages.

Opportunities for lenders

From a lending perspective, Roma predicts that more lenders will opt for unique or tailored rates and criteria for each transaction. There are big opportunities for innovative lenders willing to look at how they can provide funding for more complex cases and update their underwriting requirements to take the new legislation requirements into account.

Scott Marshall, managing director of Roma Finance, commented: “Clearly a barrage of regulation and legislation is moulding a new breed of landlords. The days of the hobbyist landlord are numbered as the upkeep and management of rental properties becomes more onerous.

“The private rental sector is due for another shake up in 2018, and beyond, and only the larger players will be able to cope, as they can benefit from their scale of operation.  With the HMO rules coming into force in October, maybe more affordable housing is needed more than ever as an alternative.

“However, as a lender we’re still experiencing a high level of finance demand for rental property, and in the wider market there are many product updates being introduced as lenders seek to adjust criteria to keep pace with a changing market. But it seems clear that the future will be driven by professional landlords rather than the armchair investors of the past.”

Source: Mortgage Finance Gazette

Marketing No Comments

First-time buyers need 10 and a half years to save for a deposit

In Q1 2018 the average single first-time buyer would have to save for 10 and a half years to raise a 15 per cent deposit on their first home.  This is slightly down on the 11 years recorded in Q1 2017 and reflects slower house price growth and a rise in incomes.

The average single first-time buyer who started saving in Q1 2018 would not be able to purchase a home until the autumn of 2028.

 Sharing rent and every day household costs such as food and bills means that a couple can save faster – under half the time of a single first-time buyer.  In Q1 2018 the average couple buying for the first time would need to save for five years – unchanged from 2016 (table 1).

This means that the average first-time buyer couple who started saving in Q1 2018 could set up home by the spring of 2023.

A single Londoner hoping to buy for the first time would need to save for 17 years to raise a 15 per cent deposit whereas a couple would need eight years (table 1).  It is now six months quicker for a couple to save up for a home in London than at the same period last year.  A slowdown in London house price growth and higher income growth explains the change.

In Q1 2018 a single first-time buyer in London would not be able to move into their new home until 2035.

The fastest place to save for a 15 per cent deposit is in the North East, where it takes a couple just under three years (two years nine months), and a single person six years and three months.

Saving for a 5 per cent rather than a 15 per cent deposit means first-time buyers can save faster.  Five per cent is the minimum deposit needed to qualify for Help to Buy.

For a single first-time buyer it would take three years and nine months to save up for a 5 per cent deposit (table 2).  This is over six and a half years faster than saving up for a 15 per cent deposit.

In Q1 2018 it would take a couple saving for a 5 per cent deposit on their first home one year and nine months, this compares to five years when saving for a 15 per cent deposit.

But in London the time to save for a 5 per cent deposit rises to three years for a couple and five years and nine months for a single first-time buyer (table 2).

Aneisha Beveridge, Analyst, Hamptons International said:

“Saving a deposit is still the biggest barrier to buying a first home.  It takes a single person more than a decade to save up in the current climate.  But the additional support from Help to Buy brings down the time it takes to raise a deposit by over six years for a single first-time buyer. 

 “Slower house price growth in the capital has meant that it’s now six months quicker for a couple, who share household spending, to save up for a 15 per cent deposit in London.  But it still takes a couple in London eight years to save up, twice as long as someone buying a home in the North.”

Source: London Loves Business

Marketing No Comments

Lenders and brokers ‘too quiet’ over PRA Buy to Let changes

Mortgage lenders and brokers have been too quiet over the Prudential Regulatory Authority’s (PRA) changes to buy to let lending, according to the National Landlords Association (NLA).

The NLA says that despite the significant regulatory changes to lending criteria and the application process for portfolio landlords, introduced by the PRA over the last 18 months, more than half 55% were still unaware.

The findings, from the NLA’s Quarterly Landlord Panel, shows that just 8% of landlords said their lender had been in touch about the changes, with 16% saying they had been contacted by their broker.

Almost seven in 10 landlords 68% said neither their lender nor broker had made contact with them about the changes. However, the findings show that brokers and lenders may have concentrated their efforts on larger portfolio landlords, with 26% of portfolio landlords saying their broker had been in touch, and nine per cent saying their lender had made contact.

Richard Lambert, CEO at the NLA said:

“The PRA’s changes will greatly affect the ability of landlords to find new finance and continue to provide good quality affordable housing to those who need it”.

The NLA says that it’s vital landlords are supported through the changes, having issued broad advice earlier in the year urging landlords to contact their mortgage broker or bank before committing to any new property or finance.

“We hope that that the reason such a significant number of landlords haven’t been contacted is because their existing deals are simply not yet close to expiry. However, it’s in lenders’ and brokers’ own interests to speak to landlords about the changes sooner rather than later, otherwise it could mean a missed opportunity in terms of new business.

“If landlords don’t get the right support and information about how the changes will impact their existing loans, then it could mean higher finance costs that many just won’t be able to absorb”.

Source: Property118

Marketing No Comments

Two years on: how Brexit has affected the UK economy

The UK economy was supposed to plunge into recession soon after the vote to leave the EU, but the majority of forecasters were wrong.

Consumer confidence remained positive, encouraging increased spending, despite a slowdown in almost every other sector of the economy. As household consumption is a large contributor to GDP growth, it more than offset weakness elsewhere, painting a picture of success for those backing Brexit.

However, the growth in consumption to its fastest rate since 2005 was totally unsustainable. As the pound plunged after the vote, the cost of imports rose for manufacturers and retailers. This did not deter shoppers at first; indeed, households reduced their savings rate to record low levels in order to fund the post-Brexit splurge.

How inflation has affected household and business spending

Eventually, inflation caught up and households were forced to cut back, causing the economy to slow sharply over 2017. The UK went from being the fastest growing economy in the G7 to the slowest.

Businesses had started to postpone and cut investment projects as far back as 2015, well before the referendum result was known. Since then, business investment has fallen further, only to recover a little in recent months. It grew by just 2.4% in 2017, half the rate averaged between 2011 and 2015. Moreover, the initial surge in foreign direct investment (FDI) after the fall in the pound has now ended. There was an 82% fall in inward FDI in Q4 2017 compared to Q4 2016. Instead, pessimism has taken hold with planning focused on the worst-possible outcome. Some companies have even started to relocate staff, for fear of facing restrictions on their ability to do businesses.

Looking ahead, UK economic growth is likely to be sluggish at around 1.4% in 2018. With inflation forecast to average 2.6%, the UK will feel like a stagflationary environment for some time. As for 2019, the outlook is very uncertain. We assume a transition period will be agreed that preserves the status quo of the single market and customs union membership, but this is unlikely to help growth recover much.

When will the Bank increase rates?

Meanwhile, the Bank of England (BoE) is closely monitoring Brexit events and the reaction in the economy. After aborting a rate hike in May, the consensus has shifted dramatically away from a rise in the near term, to one possibly by the end of the year (63% chance priced by markets).

The next BoE Inflation Report is due in August, which provides the Bank another opportunity to consider its policy stance, but given recent weakness in both UK and overseas data, the bank rate is likely to remain on hold.

We forecast the BoE to hike once more in 2018 (November), and two more times in 2019 after the 29 March Brexit deadline.

Source: City A.M.

Marketing No Comments

Better later than never? Property market springs back to life in May

The typical spring bounce in the property market may have started slightly later this year, as HMRC data shows a 12.1% boost in transactions during May.

HMRC’s property transactions statistics had registered a fall in sales during April, but the latest data suggests a more positive market.

The taxman recorded 95,480 residential property transactions last month, up 12.1%  on April  but down 1% annually.

All UK regions saw a monthly rise, with the Welsh market up 25.2% to 4,460 transactions, and England saw a 12.4% boost in sales to 80,900.

Transactions in Scotland were up 3.6% to 7,970 on a monthly basis while Northern Ireland saw a 10.8% jump over the month to 2,150 deals.

Compared with the same period last year, Wales and England were down just 0.4% and 0.5% annually, while Scottish transactions slid 7%.

Only Northern Ireland saw an increase in sales annually, up 1.8%.

The figures are less impressive on a seasonally adjusted basis, up 0.8% between April and May, and 0.5% annually to 99,590.

Commenting on the non-adjusted figures, Neil Knight, business development director of Spicerhaart Part Exchange & Assisted Move, said: “While we are still nowhere near the levels we were seeing before the credit crunch – when the number of transactions had risen constantly over a number of years to reach a peak of around 150,000 per month – it is a marked increase, and could suggest we will start to see a bit of an uplift, especially in the new build sector.

“We are currently working with a range of house builders that have got lots of big developments in the pipeline.

“The focus on new housing over the past few years – with incentives such as Help to Buy – is starting to boost the new-build sector, and while we are unlikely to hit the Government’s targets, we are at least moving in the right direction, and this should help boost the rest of the property sector too.”

Source: Property Industry Eye

Marketing No Comments

Fintech – A property technology evolution or revolution?

Proptech is a broad term used to refer to a new generation of business and business models based on new and emerging technologies that are disrupting the traditional property markets and business models. Proptech and Fintech are closely related with the overlap of these two areas being how value is exchanged and transferred. In addition to this, it is related to how information is shared and, increasingly, how transparently this is being done.

The origins of proptech date back to the 1990s when the internet began to dominate the way we communicate, and the growth of the internet in 1995/96 led to the dot-com boom, which real estate participated in, albeit quite slowly and quite reluctantly.

So, the internet in the late 1990s was the first building block that established the proptech movement.

It took quite some time in the 2000’s for businesses like Rightmove and Zoopla to get established as residential listing sites using simple internet technology to transfer information.

The real driver that has created the third and current wave of innovation, which is unprecedented and much bigger than what was going on at the early 2000s, is mobile technology, the use of apps, and also the global financial crisis.

The global 2008/9 financial crisis questioned the competence of professionals and traditional ways of doing business in the whole financial tech area, and that made innovators think about alternative ways of transmitting information and transacting assets.

In parallel with the boom of mobile technology and social media apps in the late 2000s, established a platform whereby people could think about trading their most important assets, which would typically be their house, online, through an app, and that’s still the direction we’re heading.

So the origins of proptech are the internet growth in the 1990s, then the growth of mobile apps, and the global financial crisis.

There are three sorts of applications that are currently being worked on, and each of the three proptech horizontals provides unique opportunities and challenges within the proptech space.

The first being information exchange which is a phenomenon of the fintech revolution.

The giving of information online was broadly the first use of the internet.

By consequence, the provision of information about marketplaces is the first fintech movement that has transmitted directly into real estate tech, and particularly residential listings.

Indeed, crowdfunding, as a concept, can be coupled with fintech to produce more creative ways of attracting capital to buy a property.

But it’s tech that’s enabling this business because it brings together a large market of people who want to finance property with a large pool of people who want to invest in property.

So, technology is facilitating that, simply through the efficiency of information exchange through platforms.

The second application of fintech is in transactions, which are slowly being incorporated in real estate.

Indeed, slow it is, with the principle inhibitor being the conservativism of the real estate industry, but perhaps more importantly, it’s to do with the importance and the sheer size of property assets.

Trading property online with no consumer protection, no obvious protection from human beings involved in the process, and a lack of regulation in the process is difficult for people to contemplate.

The transaction process is being facilitated slowly through technology. but there is a lot of resistance, which is very naturally due to human conservatism.

The lack of regulation of the online trading of real estate is probably holding back innovation in this area. Some efficient regulation of online trading of property, would give people much more confidence to be able to trade.

Nevertheless, we are starting to see websites that allow for properties being traded online, sign a contract online through a digital signature. As blockchain, becomes established, I can see this increasing, but it will be slow.

It also asks big questions about blockchain as a way of effecting a transaction and, again, the same question arises, where is the investor protection in blockchain?

Will people accept that the automated, codified regulation process is enough protection, or will they need lawyers and regulatory authorities to be supervising the process in order that there is some redress if anything goes wrong?

The third application of technology that’s hitting proptech is in a different area. And this is to do with the control of buildings, which can be managed through mobile apps or through computers.

So, the best example of that would be the ability to turn your heating on when you’re travelling home from your mobile phone.

And the Internet of Things and smart technology applied to real estate is increasingly well established. It’s generally associated with energy saving. So, the movement is really projected and driven by the need to save energy.

There are many effective apps, which will be developed to help us save energy in homes, and to switch things on and off, and to increase our security, and so on. Those different proptech applications are driven partly by fintech and partly by construction and architecture.

In summary, the property sector is evolving with things much more transparent and computable than they ever were before.

Coupled with technologies like blockchain and AI, which are making the processing of that data, and the transference into actual contracts, almost completely automatic.

How long will it be before you’ll be able to buy an entire building with one click, and that’s it? No more documents and reams of paper and checks of the title and such like.

It’ll all be understood in these digital systems in such a way that you can just say, finance it, buy it, and that’s it.

Source: Mortgage Introducer

Marketing No Comments

Last-time buyers struggle to find the homes they want

Last-time buyers are struggling to find houses to move to, as the potential financial gains from downsizing are not high enough and they cannot find suitable homes in their local area, Key Retirement has found.

Nearly one in three (30%) of over-65s homeowners – the equivalent of 1.45 million owners – are considering downsizing in the next five years to a more suitable home for retirement.

But across the country more than 620,000 over-65s homeowners said they have looked into downsizing but cannot find a suitable home in their area, while another 500,000 said they’ve considered moving but would not be much better off financially.

Dean Mirfin, chief product officer at Key Retirement, said: “Downsizing should make financial sense for older homeowners as it releases money to pay for retirement and it also should make sense for the property market as a whole as it frees up bigger houses.

“But despite the numbers of older homeowners wanting to downsize it is clear they face problems in finding suitable homes for retirement and for many the finances just don’t add up. Unfortunately, that leaves them struggling to maintain homes, and in many cases, struggling financially.

“Pensioners are sitting on property wealth of more than £1 trillion which could significantly improve their standard of living in retirement and helping them make the best use of that money would boost their finances and the economy as a whole.”

The numbers looking to move home in retirement rose as high as 58% in the North East and 44% in the South West, underlining how many want to swap their family homes for more manageable houses.

However not being able to move in retirement is a major concern as more than half (53%) of over-65s reported keeping up with DIY jobs around the house is physically tough. And 27% reported they struggle to afford maintenance on their homes.

Just over two out of five (42%) over-65s homeowners have worries about bills and the need for repairs on their home and nearly one in five (17%) thought their house is just too big for their needs.

Around 11% of over-65s homeowners said they have already downsized, with pensioners in the North West and South East (both 13%) being the most likely to have already made the move to a more suitable house.

Nick Sanderson, chief executive of retirement housing provider, Audley Group, said that the supply of downsizing options is not keeping up with the demand.

He said: “The supply of downsizing options is simply not keeping up with demand. Instead of providing incentives and high quality housing for older generations, the housing market continues to be flooded with initiatives for first time buyers.

“That’s not to say it should be a case of ‘either, or’, but the other factor at play here is the growing population of over 65s.

“There are currently 9.9 million people over the age of 65 in England, a number that is forecast to rise by 20% over the next decade. However, only 2% of the UK housing stock is designated as retirement housing.

“The growth potential for the retirement village sector is huge, and enabling older people to move into appropriate housing will free up homes for others, creating much-needed movement in the property market.”

Source: Mortgage Introducer